Thursday, March 9, 2023

The Finalists (David Bell)

 

The Finalists
David Bell
⭐: 4/5

Pros: great plot idea, loved the historical background, loved the diverse characters. I kind of had a feeling from the start of "who done it", but was wrong, so that was nice.

I was kept guessing the whole while. Props for that.

Cons: politics are not my most favorite subject ever and it felt like they were a light undertone in this. It's good to bring attention to things and I felt it wasn't overdone, I just thought, "really?" several times. Then again, that's how I feel in general with them, so this point may be completely irrelevant for some of y'all.

Conclusion: if you want a fairly fast paced "who done it", see if you like this. You've seen my pros and cons, so hopefully they help!

.

Tuesday, March 7, 2023

The Children on the Hill (Jennifer McMahon)

 

The Children on the Hill
Jennifer McMahon
⭐: 4/5

Pros: the duality of human nature is certainly explored in this work and I give mad props for the creative ways in which it's done.

I appreciated the twist towards the end. I thought I'd figured everything out, and did some of it, but not that switch up! I'd say the last 25% of the book is what held my attention the most, though the prior 75% was necessary to plot and character build.

I'm a fan historical sciences (I'm a scientist myself), so definitely was intrigued by how TCOTH presented it.

Cons: I personally am not in love with repeated information, especially in excess. This can be in the form of word repetition in paragraphs or the same ideas over and over. There's a book title that is said so many times, authors included, that I thought, "Again? How many times is that now?" Its existence is important, as are those who wrote it, but I felt it was overemphasized that way.

I also felt the description fell short. While it was there, it didn't feel creatively presented. Everything was a list of what was in the room or what was learned. I'd like to have seen it woven more organically via actions and conversations.

Conclusion: if you want something that's suspenseful and about medical history, give this a go. However, if you're ridiculously meticulous about how stories are written and presented, you may not love it. I think the bones of the story are fabulous, but just wasn't thrilled about the execution of animating them.

Friday, March 3, 2023

The Housemaid (Freida McFadden)



The Housemaid
Frieda McFadden
 ⭐: 5/5

Pros: this did not end or go where I was certain it would, but that's not a bad thing in the least. It's difficult to describe pros without spoilers, so let's say that one may be a bit annoyed with what I'm going to list in the cons, but that they're worth being annoyed over when all is said and done.

Cons: first, I'm allergic to peanuts and we have a jar in our kitchen. This was made to be a huge deal. It isn't. It isn't hard to avoid the jar or potential cross-contamination. Second, I was annoyed with all the romance. Wasn't this supposed to be a thriller? Last, there are some words that get used over and over in paragraphs and that is a little annoying to me, but all the same, points were made.

Conclusion: the cons are absolutely worth dealing with for the pros. Read that again and maybe you'll catch my drift. Read this book and see what you think for yourself. As for myself, I'll definitely be thinking about this for a few days!

Thursday, March 2, 2023

The Broken Vows (Daniel Hurst)

 

The Broken Vows
Daniel Hurst
⭐: 5/5

OKAY, THEN. If you were a fan of Verity and had the #TeamManuscript or #TeamLetter dilemma, this is one for you! Only with a new take by the time we learn of these things. No, I'm not giving too much away!

Pros: I cannot count the times I say, "oh my gosh!" While this book could come off predictable to a small degree, the wording and plotting felt so intricate and delicious that even if I knew what was going to happen, I'd forget I knew it until it did. Those are the best kinds of stories!

The character development is strong, given there are primarily 3 MCs all involved in one plot with many layers. This also means the plot development itself also had accolades to be sung about. I couldn't get enough!

Cons: I don't think this is necessarily a con, but this is my standard review format, so I'd say if cancer and/or cheating of any sort bothers you, you should think before you pick this up. I wasn't triggered by either despite having experienced both in one form or another.

Conclusion: if you want something full of revenge, manipulating, "things aren't always what they seem", and wow factors, pick this up like five minutes ago!

The Finalists (David Bell)

  The Finalists David Bell ⭐: 4/5 Pros: great plot idea, loved the historical background, loved the diverse characters. I kind of had a feel...